Excuse me but, the police are some of the BIGGER fools in the workforce. NOT ALL, but, come on--even the police would agree with me on this (again not all) point is, they are some egotistical cops running your streets with a grudge and "thing or two" to prove...one of which, is---they are never wrong. How old are you anyhow - 12, 17 - or 22 and never been in the real world? Because, obviously you don't have a clue. I'm sorry but, that's just a fact, about you and about the police. Granted, there are "some good ones" out there but to be very honest with you....their minds are as tainted as some of the conspiracy thinking minds that the Air Force is trying to spray gas that is making humanity commit these kind of crimes. Wake up people, this woman is INNOCENT "until" proven guilty as there isn't any evidence of her guilt. We haven't heard ANY incriminating "evidence" besides this suitcase that was left on the street. Easily "could" have been taken by a relative that she's covering up for. Which brings up another point; why isn't she "allowed" visitors?? Seems rather f---ed up to me. She DROVE herself into the interrogation...would you have if you just murdered someone? That's a rhetorical question (you can look up rhetorical in the dictionary).
Excuse me but, the police are some of the BIGGER fools in the workforce. NOT ALL, but, come on--even the police would agree with me on this (again not all) point is, they are some egotistical cops running your streets with a grudge and "thing or two" to prove...one of which, is---they are never wrong. How old are you anyhow - 12, 17 - or 22 and never been in the real world? Because, obviously you don't have a clue. I'm sorry but, that's just a fact, about you and about the police. Granted, there are "some good ones" out there but to be very honest with you....their minds are as tainted as some of the conspiracy thinking minds that the Air Force is trying to spray gas that is making humanity commit these kind of crimes. Wake up people, this woman is INNOCENT "until" proven guilty as there isn't any evidence of her guilt. We haven't heard ANY incriminating "evidence" besides this suitcase that was left on the street. Easily "could" have been taken by a relative that she's covering up for. Which brings up another point; why isn't she "allowed" visitors?? Seems rather f---ed up to me. She DROVE herself into the interrogation...would you have if you just murdered someone? That's a rhetorical question (you can look up rhetorical in the dictionary).